mobile background

We provide 

the Essential Value


We add value of your understanding of regulatory guidance on


Impurity

Extractables and Leachables

CCIT (Container closure Integrity testing)


Also, Saint-Gobain with Tubing and Bag as Single use system

SWISS BASEL, E&L SCHOOL Welcome KOREA CUSTOMER

🌐 Quality by Design Inc. - Your Trusted Partner in E&L Studies 🌐

At Quality by Design Inc., we pride ourselves on being at the forefront of the Extractables and Leachables (E&L) study landscape. Our comprehensive services cover:


🔍 Consultation on the current E&L study approach 

🔬 Critical assessment and evaluation 

📜 Extractables & Leachables study and profiling 

🧪 Identification & Toxicological evaluations 

🛡️ Risk and Safety assessments 

✅ Regulatory Registration support


Key Areas of Expertise:

  • Container closure systems like glass vials, stoppers, and related products.
  • Single-use systems and process contact materials.
  • All types of Medical Devices.

"We proudly showcase our global regulatory expertise, with a track record of obtaining product approvals across:

  • FDA, EMA, CHINA, KOREA, JAPAN, BRASIL, Türkiye(Turkey) and more.

Have an inquiry or need expert advice? 📩 Reach out to us at qbd@qbd.co.kr

For a more in-depth look at what we offer, visit our official website at www.qbd.co.kr

Let's navigate the complexities of E&L together! We look forward to partnering with you. 💼🌟


E&L and Pharmaceutical Regulatory Compliance AI 

의약품 인허가 관련 질문하시고 간단한 답변 받으실 수 있습니다.


큐비디 SERVICE ITEMUse of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process"

관리자
2023-08-15
조회수 1964

Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process"


Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

Document issued on: September 4, 2020

 

The draft of this document was issued on April 23, 2013.

 

This document supersedes “Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process"” dated June 16, 2016.


Introduction

FDA has developed this guidance document to assist industry in preparing Premarket Applications (PMAs), Humanitarian Device Exceptions (HDEs), Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Applications, Premarket Notifications (510(k)s), and De Novo requests for medical devices that come into direct contact or indirect contact with the human body1 in order to determine the potential for an unacceptable adverse biological response resulting from contact of the component materials of the device with the body. The purpose of this guidance is to provide further clarification and updated information on the use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process" to support applications to FDA. This guidance replaces Office of Device Evaluation (ODE) Blue Book Memorandum #G95-1 (1995), entitled “Use of International Standard ISO-10993, ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 1: Evaluation and Testing.’” This guidance document also incorporates several new considerations, including the use of risk-based approaches to determine if biocompatibility testing is needed, chemical assessment recommendations, and recommendations for biocompatibility test article preparation for devices with submicron or nanotechnology components and for devices made from in situ polymerizing and/or absorbable materials, which were not previously discussed in G95-1.


When assessing new devices, the sponsor should specifically state if the device does not have any direct or indirect tissue contact,2 and no further biocompatibility information would be needed.


When assessing device modifications, the sponsor should specifically state if the modification does not result in a change to any direct or indirect tissue-contacting components, and no further biocompatibility information would typically be needed. However, if the change could affect other parts of the device with direct or indirect contact that were not changed, a biocompatibility evaluation should be conducted to assess the potential impact of the change. For example, if a new non-contact internal component is added, but it requires the application of heat in order to join to another component that has patient contact, the patient-contacting component may be impacted by the application of heat such that biocompatibility could be impacted, and should be assessed.

0 0